Searay 350/370 opinions?

mariner61

Member
exMember
Joined
Nov 16, 2006
RO Number
24261
Messages
106
I had a 1990 310 sundancer, lost it in Ernesto. I am now looking at replacing the boat. I was contemplating upgrading to a 1991 350 or 1994 370 SD. Anyone with experience with these boats would be greatly appreciated. ie: gas consumption, handling, speed etc as well as in comparison to the 310.

Nick
 
I believe by SD, you meant the Sedan Bridge which Sea Ray calls the "DB". Hope this helps:

Summary for 1992 Sea Ray 370 Sedan (anything this age will need a new interior - unless you're a Miami Vice fan)

  • Cruises at an honest and easy 22kts
  • Comfortable & dry ride up to 3 footers (after that, you're on your own)
  • Range (with 15% reserve) is about 180 miles at planing speed
  • Has Cummins 6BTA5.9 M2 engines. I've heard the gas engine models are sluggish for this boat.
    We use it alot and fill up twice per month. I think I spend more in fuel than for my slip. This is because of use though, consumption seems to be on par with my dockmates boats. (my flowscans need replacing)
  • The overall layout is good with a useful mid cabin and full galley
  • With full canvas, I can't see behind me at the water line when docking. This is about a 6' deep blind spot. (I still single hand it all the time though)

Read on for the long version...

We planned to hold this boat for a short time and move into the 55 or 58 sedan as we learned to handle a bigger boat. Now we've decided that since we go out once or twice a week, the 370 is a better match for our lifestyle and usage. It's easy to get in and out of marinas and creep up close to the islands we like to anchor at. The draft is less than 3 feet, so we can practically walk off the boat on to the beach.

This boat is pretty solid structurally. There were no blisters in the hull and after two rounds of compound and a wheel, she looks brand new.

As a 1992 (you're looking at a 94), she needed the following:
  • Cutlass bearings
  • New shafts & assoc. packing
  • Repack all glands (shafts/rudders)
  • New chartplotter - orig. was DOA
  • New windlass - orig. was DOA
  • New Kholer 9Kw Genset - org. was DOA
  • Extended swim platform 14" (huge improvement)
  • Three new batteries
  • New antennas (old ones had short to ground)
  • Props balanced and trued
  • Bottom paint/zincs/Boot & pin striping
  • Added additional hatch to cockpit sole
  • Replaced ALL hoses and clamps
Obviously, I received a HUGE credit for these items when buying the boat. In fact, all of these items have been replaced with top of the line parts for much less than the discounts I received. I was looking for this specific boat, with these specific issues though and I didn't mind the lay up for the repairs. My biggest sticking point was that the engines had to be bulletproof. I recommend an engine survey for ANY boat purchase.

Overall, this thing is really nice. I think it's perfect for a small family of 4 on the weekends, but it could get tight on an extended cruise. My kids are approaching an age where they can't share the mid cabin, so we'll put one in the salon.

We plan to take her from Tampa to the Keys in March and then across to the Bahamas in May. Having been through all the mechanicals, I feel pretty confident about making those trips in this boat. Next will be convincing the Admiral to do the Great Loop.
 
Nick..... We also had a 1990 310DA....w/7.4's & V's. It was a nice ride and handled well...on the water and around the docks. Our current boat is a '95 370DA also with 7.4's & V's. I find the 370 to be a little more stable and a nicer riding boat. We boat in some shallow water and the pocket hull is a plus. The cockpit floor plan is alot roomier....and the cabin layout more spacious due to the wider beam.. It too handles great around the docks...and in 3 footers.

We cruise about 26 MPH at 3300RPM's....with the original 3 blade props. This season I'm considering upgrading to 4 blade.....but overall its a great boat....and we love it.
 
I also had a 1991 310/330 DA and now have a 1995 370 DA. I also shopped for 1990/91 350/370 DA. They were very nice and felt like a big 310/330 (similar design). But the admiral and I really liked the 1995 370 which is more "modern". In my opinion, it is a lot better than the 310 as it pertains to ride and comfort. Many of the 1995 370 DAs also comes with good equipment packages (generator, windlass, twin A/C units, radar, ...).
Forward arch also provide a nice clear cockpit area in the back. I cruise at 3000-3100 at 22 MPH. It is a thirsty boat though. Around 0,75 mpg.
 
Any fresh opinions? I have been on both and feel that cabin wise there is a difference but not emense. However in the cockpit , there's more space. The 1994 is great but two things bigger dollars and I don't really like the bulkhead wall at the queen berth.
 
I owned a 37 Express for 10 years and know the boat well. It has a great cockpit for intertaining and strong air conditioning. Engine access is superb compared to new boats of similar size. With gas engines, low speed handling is not good. The boat is actually pretty fast, easily cruising at 25 knots and faster as you lighten the boat due to fuel burn. Figure on .5 to .75 mpg depending on conditions. Like most SRs, you will have water leaks to deal with. These will reappear after you "fix" them. The boat lacks storage which is surprising considering its loa of 38+ feet. The sofa is not very comfortable. Sea keeping in Lake Michigan chop is average at best and the drawers, hanging locker, etc come out or open up when under way. The TV comes out of its locker too. In the end, we switched brands as the 37 always needed to have a leak fixed and we got tired of dealing with this issue.
 
Back
Top