I own both. I pretty much agree with most of the experience here, especially Mike Ryans details. However, I'm recommending to fix the makita. Owning both I use them for different things now. The HF is Sooooo much lighter, its much nicer to polish an area that does not need much weight. The backing pads break easily, so I bought a good 3m one to go on the HF so I did not have to keep replacing it, at times when it was inconvenient. The white wool HF pads are made in the US and although they shed worse than my dog, they work well for the money, good value.
The HF does not pull like the Makita will. While it can obtain the speeds with a fresh pad (which you should be using anyway), it does not have but a fraction of the power. It simply can't power through and polish a section like the Makita can. When I did my 48 this season, a huge monstrous job, I found I gradually switched back to the Makita and by finish time would use nothing but the Makita. I might pick up the HF now to do some very light polishing on area that have already been mowed down by the Makita.
Personally I'd fix the Makita and then decide whether to also buy the HF. It's nice having two machines. But if money is short, then first I'd buy a fleet of white and yellow wool pads. I'm pooped after about 7 or 8 pads, so buy 4 of the white and 4 of the yellow (white for cutting, yellow for polishing). Then count your money and invest whatever is left on your machine of choice. Fresh pads are more important than a fresh machine. Don't forget to wash them every day and change out when scoring can't keep up.