California Drought Pics

Bidwell Marina is where I had my last boat. Even when it's this bad, there are still some fantastic places to go and drop the hook and there's nobody else around. I think Oroville's down about 250+ feet by now, still 650 left in the main body. 185 miles of shoreline at full pool.

The admiral...and my current boat... are in Redding, six miles from Shasta. Not sure how far down, but with 365 miles of shoreline there's still a lot of lake left.
 
Two days ago there was a great program on Water, basically on droughts.
Unfortunately the computer modules (SWAG by Computer) portend a great many more droughts in the near future.

Cal had the Pacific, where they can get a big De-sal plant going.

The Ogallala Aquifer under Nebraska down to Texas is drying up too.
They claim we are taking out more than is being replaced by natural Rain/Snow falls. So that area will be next to shut down some farming in order to have drinking water.
I think I'll invest in Desalination products!
 
The drying up of aquifers is also having another side effect of land sinking (known as subsidence).
This along with the glacial melt causing sea levels to rise is contributing to some serious flooding along coastal areas.

http://news.msn.com/in-depth/special-report-as-seas-rise-a-slow-motion-disaster-gnaws-at-us-shores

If this is indeed a long term trend, we are in for some potentially bad times.
In the short term however Thudpucker may be on to something as I've seen a article on investing to make money on the water shortage, I'll see if I can find that article.

Found the article,

http://t.money.msn.com/inside-the-ticker/5-stocks-to-profit-from-water-scarcity
 
In South Aus. I forget which city, they already have a grandiose De-Sal project going. It's said the South AUS will never have to worry about drinking water again.
C'mon CA Socialist polititions, raise up your head and look around!

I forgot: rtibble's first link may explain all the Sink Holes in FL.
 
However, whether sea levels are rising or ice caps are melting, I don't think it will change the drought picture in the southwestern or central United States
 






So would that be the same NASA that had the temp data from the 1930's wrong?

http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2007/08/14/red_faces_at_nasa_over_climatechange_blunder.html

Or would that be the same NASA who fudged the "hockey stick"?

There are three problems buying into your argument rtribble. One, there is too much, way too much evidence of results tampering. Two, the only big money available to scientists is in proving climate change, not dis-proving it. Three, there is too much upside for fascists in climate change in the form of taxes and crony capitalism.

I am willing to bet if you set up two studies, equally funded, one saying yes, the other saying no with the promise of follow on money you could get opposing views.

Until there are "clean hands" I'm not buying it.
 
[/quote]
Until there are "clean hands" I'm not buying it.

[/quote]
+1, Amen and halla-freakin'-lulia!

Bob
 
We've beat this dead horse to complete ad-nauseam in the past and I see no need to pursue it further, kinda like pissing into the wind.
Believe what you wish and I shall do likewise. I'm not trying to convince anyone any way or the other, they can research and draw their own conclusions when it comes to climate change/global warming/another ice age or whatever.
But whatever the cause, the current drought is a very serious problem for those effected and the future doesn't look too incouraging.
 
quote:

Originally posted by rtribble

We've beat this dead horse to complete ad-nauseam in the past and I see no need to pursue it further, kinda like pissing into the wind.
Believe what you wish and I shall do likewise. I'm not trying to convince anyone any way or the other, they can research and draw their own conclusions when it comes to climate change/global warming/another ice age or whatever.
But whatever the cause, the current drought is a very serious problem for those effected and the future doesn't look too incouraging.






Yes, the "current" drought is serious, because, there has never been a serious drought before, nor a serious flood. These things totally kill the future of anybody and they will never recover.

If you were pissing in the wind, you would only be getting yourself wet. As it is your position affects everyone, unless you are willing to stop voting which is about as likely as you giving up your hypocritical pentiant for burning fuel and creating green house gasses for no other reason than to ride around in a boat for recreational purposes while lecturing us on "climate change". Your hands are the most dirty of all.
 
The Southern Hemisphere polar ice cap for the month of April 2014 surpassed its greatest April extent in recorded history. The new record extends a long-term expansion of the Antarctic ice sheet that defies alarmist claims that global warming is or should be melting the polar ice caps.

Ironically, the record Antarctic ice extent occurred as global warming alarmists released a paper claiming recent global warming has now made it inevitable that Antarctica will lose its ice cap nearly 1,000 years from now. The establishment media has given the alarmist paper extensive and uncritical press coverage, even though objective scientists have pointed out glaring flaws in the paper. For example, objective scientists question why recent warming has put the Antarctic ice sheet past a tipping point when the ice sheet has survived many warmer periods in the past.

Satellite instruments measuring the precise extent of the Southern Hemisphere polar ice cap report the polar ice cap has been steadily growing for decades. Moreover, the combined extent of the Northern Hemisphere and Southern Hemisphere polar ice caps have been above the long-term average almost uniformly since 2012.


http://news.heartland.org/newspaper...ell-record-polar-ice-cap-it-should-be-melting
 
Back
Top