I have fallen in love with the 81-92 Carver 28 Voyager/Mariner. I really do not want I/O's, so that is why I am focusing only on those years. It seems to be the perfect compromise for me right now.
Anyway, in looking at a boat this past weekend, the current owner had both engines pulled out and only rebuilt the top ends including carburetors (Crusaders with Rochester carbs). Why did he do that? Shouldn't he have replaced/rebuilt the engines as a whole after going through the expense of removing them completely? Why not rebuild the transmissions then too?
It just seemed like the perfect opportunity to give the boat a major overhaul and made me a bit weary. Also, there was a fair amount of oily residue in the bilge, which was explained away as an extremely minor transmission leak, fixed by tightening all the housing bolts to spec.
The oily bilge also bugged me, as again, with engines out, at least repainting/cleaning the bilge seems like the thing to do.
Am I being too paranoid?
The engines have 1100 hours each with about 200 after the 1/2 rebuild job.
Anyway, in looking at a boat this past weekend, the current owner had both engines pulled out and only rebuilt the top ends including carburetors (Crusaders with Rochester carbs). Why did he do that? Shouldn't he have replaced/rebuilt the engines as a whole after going through the expense of removing them completely? Why not rebuild the transmissions then too?
It just seemed like the perfect opportunity to give the boat a major overhaul and made me a bit weary. Also, there was a fair amount of oily residue in the bilge, which was explained away as an extremely minor transmission leak, fixed by tightening all the housing bolts to spec.
The oily bilge also bugged me, as again, with engines out, at least repainting/cleaning the bilge seems like the thing to do.
Am I being too paranoid?
The engines have 1100 hours each with about 200 after the 1/2 rebuild job.