He's Back....

Comfortably Numb

Member
exMember
Joined
Jan 9, 2008
RO Number
29205
Messages
283
Check this out! The Gov, the one with the really broke state governmebt, is still trying to fund the periferal canal! Unbeleivable!

Governor Lauds Introduction of Peripheral Canal and Dams Bill
by Dan Bacher, editor of the FishSniffer
February 26, 2009 -- Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger today praised Senator Dave Cogdill's (R-Fresno) introduction of SB 371, the Safe, Clean, Reliable Drinking Water Supply Act of 2009, another thinly disguised attempt to build a peripheral canal and more dams.

He drew attention to the current low conditions of Central Valley reservoirs, a manufactured "water crisis" caused by poor planning by the Department of Water Resources and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, in order to scare people into supporting the water bond. Over the past couple of years, the state and federal governments exported massive quantities of water to the Westlands Water District, Kern Water Bank and southern California, in spite of below normal rainfall.

“Despite the recent rainstorms, California would still need to see weeks of drenching rain to avoid an extreme drought situation this summer," said Schwarzenegger. "Our water crisis underscores the urgent need to update California's water infrastructure so we are able to capture excess rain in wet years and have the necessary reserves in dry years like this one-this is critical to our economy, our jobs, our environment and our way of life."

After signing a budget last Friday that slashed environmental and health protections, the Governor - as usual with no sense of irony - today promoted an environmentally devastating pork barrel boondoggle that would cost an estimated $12 billion to $24 billion of taxpayer money.

"Now that we have passed a historic budget, it is time that we continue with the water reforms proposed by a bipartisan group of leaders more than a year ago, and Senator Cogdill's bill should get the ball rolling again," said Schwarzenegger. "I know that California's legislators recognize the need to ensure a clean, reliable water supply and I look forward to working with them to pass a comprehensive water solution this year that increases storage, improves conveyance, protects the Delta's ecosystem and promotes greater water conservation."

"Increasing storage" means building Temperance Flat Dam on the San Joaquin River and Sites Dam on the west side of the Sacramento Valley, while "improving conveyance" translates into constructing the peripheral canal, an outdated concept that the voters rejected by a wide margin in 1982.

Cogdill's bill calls for issuing $9.98 billion in general obligation bonds to "invest in the state's aging water infrastructure." The proposal includes

$3 billion "dedicated to the development of additional storage for statewide benefit." The proposal includes a lot of deceptive "eco-language" that gives one the impression that the bill is about restoring fish populations, not destroying them.

The bill directs the Resources Agency "or another agency as may be designated by statute, taking into consideration the recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Task Force established by Executive Order S-17-06 and the Bay Delta Conservation Plan, to develop and implement, in cooperation with the department, the Department of Fish and Game, and the State Water Resources Control Board, a comprehensive Delta sustainability program that includes both ecosystem and water conveyance improvements."

Last July, the Governor and Senator Dianne Feinstein proposed a "compromise" plan to the Legislature to "update" California's water system that Schwarzenegger claimed "would put the state on the path toward restoring the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, expanding water supplies and promoting conservation efforts that will ensure a clean, reliable water supply for California."

However, a coalition of recreational and commercial fishing groups, environmental organizations, Indian Tribes and others are opposing any proposal that includes a peripheral canal and more dams. The purpose of the canal and more dams is to create the infrastructure to export more water to corporate agribusiness on the west side of the San Joaquin Valley at a time when Central Valley Chinook salmon, delta smelt, longfin smelt, green sturgeon and other fish populations are in collapse, due to massive water exports out of the California Delta and declining water quality in recent years.

State and federal scientists last week released a report stating that only 66,264 natural and hatchery adult fall Chinooks returned to the Sacramento River basin in 2008, the lowest spawning escapement on record. It is expected that commercial and recreational salmon fishing in the ocean off California and Oregon will be closed again this year, due to the collapse of the Central Valley fall Chinook run.

The canal and dams that Schwarzenegger, Cogdill and Feinstein so fanatically support will drive these imperiled fish populations over the precipice of extinction. Schwarzenegger constantly portrays himself as the "Green Governor" as he spouts off about "green energy" and "solving global warming," but there is nothing "green" about species extinction!
 
It is coming at us from all sides now...........

Latino group enters California's water wars
By E.J. Schultz
Bee Capitol Bureau
last updated: February 26, 2009 09:43:12 PM

SACRAMENTO -- A new army has joined California's water wars.

A group called the Latino Water Coalition is pushing for state-financed dams and canals, joining white farmers and big water districts.

The coalition -- mostly comprising Latino business and civic leaders -- is targeting the Legislature's Latino caucus in hopes the lawmakers will break with other Democrats who oppose dams for environmental reasons.

It's a mostly personal appeal.

"We're able to connect because these are individuals who, for the most part, understand the culture," said Firebaugh City Manager Jose Ramirez, a Democrat and coalition member. "They speak our language."

His farming town is reeling from the drought and pumping cutbacks at the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, the state's water hub. In December, Firebaugh's jobless rate was 23 percent.

Rather than quote numbers, the coalition likes to put a human face on its cause: hundreds of poor farmworkers who they say will suffer if the state does not boost water supplies.

In early February the coalition sent about 60 workers to Sacramento to press their case before lawmakers.

At a Capitol rally over the summer, at least 300 farmworkers marched and carried signs declaring "agua es vida," or water is life.

The coalition is scoring some victories.

Assembly Member Tony Mendoza, D-Artesia, vice chairman of the 26-member Latino Legislative Caucus, said he would support a state bond that includes money for dams.

"I'm not from the Central Valley, but I understand," Mendoza said. "I have family that lives there, I have relatives that live up and down the state and water is a critical issue."

The Latino caucus plans to soon send a letter to Assembly Speaker Karen Bass, D-Los Angeles, and Senate leader Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, urging them to restart water negotiations.

Latino Caucus member Jose Solorio, a Democrat whose Assembly district includes Anaheim and Santa Ana, said the coalition is "an important new part of the debate."

"It's nice to know that the needs for water in the Central Valley extend far beyond the needs of Big Ag," he said.

Gov. Schwarzenegger has been trying to broker a water deal for two years. But Democratic leaders have balked at his $9.3 billion water bond proposal, which includes $3 billion for water storage, including possibly a dam near Millerton Lake east of Fresno.

The coalition supports the bond, as well as a proposed new canal to send water around the delta to cities and farms. In the short term, they want the state and federal government to ease environmental regulations to increase pumping from the delta. The rules are in place to protect endangered fish.

Environmentalists say conservation and ground-water storage are the quicker and cheaper options to boost the state's dwindling water supplies.

Some groups say the Latino caucus is too focused on farms, while ignoring the clean drinking water needs of farmworker communities.

"I appreciate the fact that they're going out and trying to engage folks on the ground," but "I'm not sure they're conveying the whole story," said Debbie Davis, legislative analyst for the Environmental Justice Coalition for Water based in Oakland.

The Latino coalition was formed in 2006 after a meeting in Selma between valley Latino leaders and Schwarzenegger. The governor "encouraged us to put together a coalition and spread the word," said Mario Santoyo, assistant general manager of the Friant Water Users Authority.

"The water world has not been a world where there's been great diversity of people," Santoyo said. "There's only a few Latinos in that world. I always felt kind of lonely." Orange Cove Mayor Victor Lopez reached out to actor-comedian Paul Rodriguez, who as youngster worked in the valley's fields.

Rodriguez signed on as a chairman and the group has grown to about 200 members, including some from Southern California.

The coalition, which registered for nonprofit status in December, is planning fundraisers. Organizers say that, to date, their activities have been paid for with private donations routed through the cities of Fresno and Mendota. Also, a Sacramento public relations firm that does work for Friant has given time to the coalition.

The coalition's recent Capitol trip was spurred in part by controversial comments made by Fresno environmentalist Lloyd Carter.

In a television interview in early February, Carter said farmworkers who could lose jobs if west-side Valley farmers don't get water are "not even American citizens for starters. Do you think we should employ illegal aliens?" In the aftermath, Carter stepped down from the environmental group California Water Impact Network, which said the comments did not reflect their views.

Still, the Latino coalition seized on the saga to bring attention to their cause. In the Capitol, the group distributed DVDs titled "Farmworkers Are Americans" that included a recording of Carter's comments, which aired on Fresno's KMPH (Channel 26).

In a statement, the coalition said the Carter incident "unfortunately reinforces what our coalition has long suspected -- that too many in California's environmental community care more about fish than people." Carter said the coalition is "being used by big agribusiness" and that "my remarks we're taken out of context." "What I'm talking about is exploitation of a migrant class of people, the farmworkers, who are not provided adequate housing, adequate schooling, even clean drinking water."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.modbee.com/local/v-print/story/613518.html
 
Thanks for the post, Cat! You are correct. I hate to see this!!!!!
 
Benedict Arnold Schwarzenegger looks to be making a full run at it. Just saw this in the news today as well:

Schwarzenegger to declare California drought emergency

By Samantha Young

SACRAMENTO — Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's office says he will declare a state of emergency after three years of below-average rain and snowfall in California.

The drought has forced farmers to fallow their fields, put thousands of agricultural workers out of work and prompted conservation measures in cities throughout the state.

Schwarzenegger spokeswoman Lisa Page says the governor is expected to sign the proclamation Friday afternoon.

The order will direct state agencies to provide assistance for affected communities and businesses.

Three dry winters have left California's state- and federally operated reservoirs at their lowest levels since 1992.

Federal water managers plan to temporarily cut off water this March to thousands of California farms. The state has said it probably would deliver just 15 percent of the water contractors have requested this year.

Last June, Schwarzenegger declared a statewide drought but stopped short of calling a state of emergency.

His 2008 executive order directed the state Department of Water Resources to speed water transfers to areas with the worst shortages and help local water districts with conservation efforts.
 
It sounds to me that the Governor is using fear tactic like Obama did when he wanted to pass the huge stimulus bill and the bills to come. I don't like it. And just when did So. Cal start strict water rationing? They have to water those beautiful landscapes and fill those pools, don't they?
 
It is just beyond comprehension why there is no water rationing! I heard on the news this morning that Folsome was rationing - and they have the lake!
Pisses me of something fierce. Maybe we should do a protest ralley??
Like Liz says, please support the groups that are helping to fight the battle.
Jim
 
So Cal has the money to sway the politicians under the dome. They have been receiving our water for years without exploring new ways to harvest freshwater from their doorstep. Money talks...
 
SoCal should just buy up the water rights for the central valley and use that water. It's just plain stupid to spend good water growing a monsoon crop (rice) in the desert.

BTG
 
BTG, you need to get your facts correct prior to making statements such as this. Rice is a crop which is grown in the Sacramento Valley. Corn uses almost as much water as rice. Corn crops are being reduced drastically this year due to the water shortage. Most of the corn which will be grown will be used for fuel, not food. The Central Valley usually supplies food all over the world, not just to Californians. My friend who has a 20 acre farm near Patterson will get NO agricultural allotment this year. That means he can grow NO crops and have NO income. He'll only have enough water to supply his house and his horses.

I'd rather have our water go to the farmers and not go to the gold courses and water wasters in SoCal!
 
quote:

Originally posted by Flutterby

BTG, you need to get your facts correct prior to making statements such as this. Rice is a crop which is grown in the Sacramento Valley. Corn uses almost as much water as rice. Corn crops are being reduced drastically this year due to the water shortage. Most of the corn which will be grown will be used for fuel, not food. The Central Valley usually supplies food all over the world, not just to Californians. My friend who has a 20 acre farm near Patterson will get NO agricultural allotment this year. That means he can grow NO crops and have NO income. He'll only have enough water to supply his house and his horses.

I'd rather have our water go to the farmers and not go to the gold courses and water wasters in SoCal!






Whoa... lets post your facts if you are calling out someone else.

I think BTG is correct here, he says that rice is a monsoon crop. I think I'd have to agree. It needs lots of water and you can grow it anywhere if you provide enough water! Rice isn't native to California, in fact it isn’t native to north America. In 1694, rice arrived in South Carolina, probably originating from Madagascar (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rice#United_States) History has shown us that we can grow crops in a desert if we get water and nutrients to the crop.

Rice cultivation is well-suited to countries and regions with low labor costs and high rainfall, as it is very labor-intensive to cultivate and requires plenty of water for cultivation. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rice)

A 200-bushel corn crop uses about 600,000 gallons of water — nearly 3,000 gallons per bushel.

http://southeastfarmpress.com/grains/122807-corn-water/

A bushel of shelled corn weighs 56 lbs.

http://www.unc.edu/~rowlett/units/scales/bushels.html

3000/56=53.57 gallons of water per pound of corn.

500 gallons to grow one pound of rice

http://www.mrwa.com/wcdailyusageinus.htm

Based on the available facts I would tend to state with full belief that rice takes about 10 times more water per pound of processed grain than corn. There are a lot of farmers who have risked growing crops in the central valley and as we all know there are and will always be water delivery problems in California. Rice should no longer be grown here, our water is worth to much.

The Sacramento valley gets about 20 inches of rain, but the San Joaquin is very dry, even desert in places (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Valley_(California)

Rice is a monsoonal crop as BTG pointed out and it should be grown in those areas where rainfall is not an issue like it is here.

Sorry if I have offended any rice farmers or other farmers who have risked farming in desert like conditions, but we can’t afford to be so wasteful with so little water nor should we allow water wasters in So Cal. If Golf courses can irrigate with recycled water, fine, let them stay green.

Flutterby, I feel bad for your farmer friend, but he has chosen a business that is risky and a bad choice if he wants to farm in desert like conditions expecting to irrigate with water from far away. We only have so much prime farmland with the right locations and conditions. Wanting to farm thirsty crops in a bad areas with poor conditions or having unrestricted water use in So Cal are both a bad choices.
 
We have had our fair share of goofball gov.'s. Now it's you guys turn.

Thanks,

Rduhon
 
I can't understand wanting to grow rice in the desert either. It probably costs less to grow it in Asia and ship it here anyway. That's why our pineapples no longer come from Hawaii, but places like The Philippines.

If they want to grow something in the desert, they should try growing something that does well in the desert. Something like agave. Maybe it will start a whole new industry with tequila distilleries popping up all over the central valley producing quality tequilas. It only makes sense and it will make these once desolate areas a tourist destination for tequila connoisseurs from around the world pumping more money into the local economy. Much like what has happened in the wine industry in California with areas such as the Sierra Foothills now becoming well known for their fine wines.
 
My point, which was poorly made by me, is that rice is grown north of Sacramento and is not in the Central Valley or desert. Being above the Delta, the water is then drained into the Delta to continue going on its way..... Therefore, I do NOT see a rice crop as a contributor to the decline of the Delta. Anyone who grows rice south of the Delta is really stupid and deserves to fail.

I agree that my friend's choice of location could have been better, but he is still hurting very badly this year.

There is still way too much water wasted in SoCal and little is being done to correct that. Except in San Diego County. They are working on bringing up a desalination plant to provide water to the area. A great idea! They need to do that because the LA Basin only gives SD County their polluted left over water......
 
Regardless of anyone's feelings on particular crop allotments, I stand by my comments that SoCal would do better just buying up the land and using the water rights from there, rather than diverting yet more water from the Delta and killing more fish.

BTG
 
They should buy the farmland in the Central Valley, assign the water rights to urban areas from the land (this may take enabling legislation, but it doesn't raise confiscation issues and would be easier than passing the preipherial canal), and then let the land find its highest and best use without irrigation. Agave farming, anyone? Perhaps the best use would be a new desert state park--I don't know.

I do think the present farmers should have the opportunity to sell (or not) at whatever price they choose, but clearly the water is more valuable to SoCal than it is to agriculture, and the SoCal urban water districts will be more than willing to pay for it as it will still be cheaper than desal (or a canal, for that matter.) Agriculture already pays far less for water than the cities do--it's just a question of finding the right split of that margin to induce the farmers to sell.

BTG
 
Back
Top