we are stuck with fossil fuels because the greenies have prevented nuclear energy development in the US. Wind solar etc are desirable for special purpose power but for the massive generation only nuclear is a reasonable alternative to fossil fuel.
Nuclear also has the potential to power the environmentalists current wet dream, hydrogen. As long as politics overrules engineering we will depend on fossil fuel and pour billions down an imaginary rabbit hole.
As Glenn points out all the energy we use is stored in some form prior to use. The time between creation and consumption varies with each fuel type. The cheapest kind has always been a fuel that was created long ago because it has no production cost, we just consume it. We find it convenient to use energy stored in oil a long time ago because we didn’t have to pay to store it ( make the oil) we have to pay to make the ethanol energy because of its limited time cycle, we grow it, convert it and consume it in only one year. Nuclear is another example of very long time from energy storage. We can consume it but not make more of it. Solar and wind are another example of zero production cost energy. nb. I said production cost not zero consumption cost.
I wonder what the greenies would think if they ever figured out that at lot of wind farms and solar arrays would alter climate. There isnt any free lunch.