RWS,
Thanks for all your help on this. I spent a good 90 minutes crawling over the boat, looking at construction details, tracing piping systems, etc. All in all the boat is in very good shape. I was impressed with the build quality. It is better than my current boat and I consider mine above average for the era. Teh galsswork is very good, and everywhere I could see, I saw evidence of through bolting. The rub rail alone was impressive. It must be backed with 1.5 inches of rubber. It is meant to be used. Another minor deatil of quality were the portholes. The frame was stanless steel, not plastic, the closures were threaded SS fittings and I believe there were 6 more screws holding it together than on my portholes.
The big wild card is mechanical operation. The engines, fuel tanks, generator, etc. looked good. No evidence of unaddressed leakage and the engine mounts were not rust buckets like some I saw. Still, you never know until you fire it up. With 730 hours on the engines and 380 on the gen set, I at least know the boat was used. However. It has been on land for a year. Some of the cokpit uphoilstery needs attention, but mostly the bolsters. It's actualy in better shape than I expected. The color is a marbled gray which looked like mildew on the pictures, but is the intended color and is in good shape.
Funny you mention the engine spacing. I looked at the same age 34 Sea Ray and I always thought the engines were too close . It makes access painful. Teh reason Sea Ray did that was to have the fuel tanks outboard. I think with the extar 12" beam and a slightly shorter cabin allowed Trojan to bettr place the fuel tanks.
One question I did have was the location of the potable water tank and pump. I ran out of time while tracing pipes, finding all the headwaste stuff. Is it behind the access panel on the port side locker for the mid cabin. It has to be near the stairs based on the fill location.